Weak reasoning signals
ThoughtLint looks for unsupported claims, vague language, and reasoning gaps that make a note sound more finished than it really is.
Obsidian Plugin
ThoughtLint for Obsidian is a local-first reasoning review plugin that helps catch weak claims, vague language, missing conclusions, and incomplete action plans before rough thinking becomes bad work.
This page keeps the product simple: clear problem, clear audience, privacy posture, optional enrichment, and a single canonical destination for anyone evaluating the plugin.
ThoughtLint looks for unsupported claims, vague language, and reasoning gaps that make a note sound more finished than it really is.
It helps surface when a note has evidence or discussion but no clear conclusion, no extracted decision, or no usable action plan.
Users can optionally add AI-compatible enrichment or Ground Truth verification, but those flows stay separate from the local-first default.
The plugin reviews the current Markdown note and generates issue lists, scores, and extracted structure directly in Obsidian.
Users can see weak claims, missing conclusions, and action items that are not yet concrete enough to trust.
Optional AI and Ground Truth integrations stay opt-in, which preserves the product's local-first posture.
It is a note-review plugin for Obsidian that looks for weak reasoning patterns before they turn into bad drafts, weak specs, or poor decisions.
No. Local analysis is the default. External integrations require setup and an explicit user decision to use them.
People writing research notes, specs, strategy docs, meeting notes, and decisions in Obsidian are the clearest fit.
Because claim verification is an optional extension of the workflow, not the core product. The core story is still local-first reasoning review inside Obsidian.
This page is the canonical landing page for ThoughtLint and intentionally avoids turning the plugin into a larger SEO content tree before traction exists.